Difference between revisions of "Commercial Open Source Software"

From Free Open Source Software
Jump to: navigation, search
(Language update)
Line 1: Line 1:
FOSS can be sold and often is, for example with support agreements including telephone and rapid patch response, or with services agreements to match configuration to an organization's process workflow.  And there isn't anything wrong with that according to most FOSS licenses.  Indeed, to this day the primary product of [http://www.redhat.com/ RedHat], the most commercially successful open source company ever, is the FOSS operating system Linux.
+
Commercial Open Source Software ([http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22commercial+open+source+software%22&btnG=Google+Search COSS]) often contains elements of Free Open Source Software, however limits availability of some generally enhanced functionality to closed proprietary software, thereby creating a potential path to the same old vendor lock-in, and so is not "free" and does not qualify as FOSS as a whole.  Please only document COSS on this page.
  
Commercial Open Source Software ([http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22commercial+open+source+software%22&btnG=Google+Search COSS]) often contains elements of FOSS, however it also limits availability of some enhanced functionality to closed proprietary software, thereby creating a potential path to the same old vendor lock-in, and so does not qualify as FOSS as a whole.
+
FOSS can be sold and is, for example with support agreements including rapid response, or with service contracts to match configuration to an organization's process workflow, and remain FOSS, as long as the source code is made available as per the terms of their licenses.  Indeed, the primary product of [http://www.redhat.com/ RedHat], the most commercially successful open source company ever, remains a distribution of the FOSS operating system Linux.
  
 
[[Dual-Licensed Software]] that is released under a proprietary license for administration reasons can still be FOSS if all of the software is also made available under license approved by the [http://www.opensource.org/ OSI].
 
[[Dual-Licensed Software]] that is released under a proprietary license for administration reasons can still be FOSS if all of the software is also made available under license approved by the [http://www.opensource.org/ OSI].
  
== COSS Software ==  
+
=== COSS Software ===  
  
Some COSS software applications are listed below - please do not create pages or otherwise document this software on this FOSS focused Wiki.  To include software on the list below <u>a link must be provided to a page describing elements of closed software</u>, i.e. unreleased proprietary code, with or without fees.
+
Some COSS software applications are listed below.  To include software on the list below <u>a link must be provided to a page describing elements of closed software</u>, i.e. unreleased proprietary code, with or without fees.
  
 
Content Management:
 
Content Management:

Revision as of 00:41, 18 November 2008

Commercial Open Source Software (COSS) often contains elements of Free Open Source Software, however limits availability of some generally enhanced functionality to closed proprietary software, thereby creating a potential path to the same old vendor lock-in, and so is not "free" and does not qualify as FOSS as a whole. Please only document COSS on this page.

FOSS can be sold and is, for example with support agreements including rapid response, or with service contracts to match configuration to an organization's process workflow, and remain FOSS, as long as the source code is made available as per the terms of their licenses. Indeed, the primary product of RedHat, the most commercially successful open source company ever, remains a distribution of the FOSS operating system Linux.

Dual-Licensed Software that is released under a proprietary license for administration reasons can still be FOSS if all of the software is also made available under license approved by the OSI.

COSS Software

Some COSS software applications are listed below. To include software on the list below a link must be provided to a page describing elements of closed software, i.e. unreleased proprietary code, with or without fees.

Content Management:

CRM:

Document Management:

Groupware:

  • OpenGroupware
  • Kolab - "These are collateral results of the following commercial activities: Uptodate, tested and supported packages for specific distributions can be ordered from the Kolab Konsortium."
  • Scalix
  • Zimbra

Project Management: